Historical Heritage of the Alash Autonomy and Its Impact on Contemporary Identity Policy in Kazakhstan
УДК 94 (41/99) ББК 63.3(5Каз)
Abstract
This article analyzes some of the key practices of modern identity politics in the Republic of Kazakhstan, namely the appeal to historical events, iconic figures and places of memory. One of these historical components is the memory of the Alash Autonomy (1917-1920), the Alash movement as a whole. It is noted that the Alash Republic has become a certain "historical and cultural place", memories of it in practice were reflected with the help of some symbolic forms. The author refers to such forms 1) renaming of toponyms in honor of the Alash people, 2) memorial policy dedicated to the movement, 3) renaming of social institutions in honor of the leaders of Alash-Orda, 4) cinema (films revealing the role of Alash Autonomy) and 5) official symbols of the Republic Kazakhstan (state emblem), on which the yurt was the key non-heraldic figure as a symbol of the Kazakh intelligentsia in the early 20th century. At the same time, the article not only singles out the nation-building practices formed “from above”, but also analyzes the role of symbolic forms constructed “from below”. The study examines protest movements that appeal to the basic postulates of Alash-Orda, music videos with iconic figures of the past (Alash people), as well as formed brands dedicated to the Alash movement, blogs on social networks dedicated to the Kazakh intelligentsia in the early 20th century. In addition, the paper analyzes the results of sociological surveys, which also showed the historical significance of the Alash Autonomy and the Alash movement for the Republic of Kazakhstan. At the same time, the study emphasizes a certain value gap and conflict between legitimizing, protesting and projective identities.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Всесоюзная перепись 1989 г. Национальный состав населения по республикам СССР // Рабочий архив Госко-стата России. Распределение населения по национальности. URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20110604055936/ http://demoscope.ru/weekly/ssp/sng_nac_89.php?reg=5 (дата обращения: 28.06.2022).
Bayly C.A. The Birth of the Modern World, 1780-1914: Global Connections and Comparisons. Malden, 2004.
Castells M. The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture. USA, 2010.
Башмаков А.А. Творческое наследие «Алаш» и модернизация общественного сознания // Вестник СКГУ имени М. Козыбаева. 2018. № 3 (40).
Саблин И.В., Коробейников А.С. Досоветский авто-номизм в Сибири и Центральной Азии: Бурят-Монголия и Алаш-Орда в контексте имперского кризиса // Восток (ORIENS). 2017. № 2.
Сулейменова М.Ж. Это был гениальный прорыв (к 100-летию движения «Алаш»). Караганда, 2015.
Толгамбаева Д.Т. Память об Алаш в публичных пространствах // Вестник Евразийского национального университета имени Л. Н. Гумилева. Серия: Исторические науки. Философия. Религиоведение. 2019. № 2 (127).
Аманжолова Д.А. Партия «Алаш»: история и историография. Семипалатинск, 1993.
Назарбаев Н.А. В потоке истории. Алматы, 1999.
Токаев К.-Ж. К. Мы возрождаем имена деятелей Алаша // Сетевое издание «Интернет ресурс Tengrinews». 04 июля 2021. URL: https://tengrinews.kz/kazakhstan_news/ tokaev-myi-vozrojdaem-imena-deyateley-alasha-442306/ (дата обращения: 18.07.2022).
Памятник лидерам Алаш-Орды установили в НурСултане // Сетевое издание «Интернет ресурс Tengrinews». 04 июля 2021. URL: https://tengrinews.kz/kazakhstan_ news/pamyatnik-lideram-alash-ordyi-ustanovili-v-nur-sultane-442301/ (дата обращения: 24.08.2022).
Meyer T. Inszenierung des Scheins.Voraussetzungen und Folgen symbolischer Politik. Frankfurt am Main, 1992.
Гражданская декларация Oyan, Qazaqstan // Oyan, Qazaqstan. 05 июня 2019 г. URL: https://oyan.digital/posts/ grajdanskaya-deklaraciya-oyan-qazaqstann/ (дата обращения: 11.07.2022).
Ирина Кайратовна «5000» // YouTube. 29 декабря 2020 г. URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jk7Ff9s2nkw (дата обращения: 24.06.2022).
Основные исторические события Казахстана в восприятии населения страны // Общественный фонд «Стратегия». 18 сентября 2015 г. Центр социальных и политических исследований. URL: https://www.ofstrategy.kz/ ru/research/socialresearch/item/457-osnovnye-istoricheskie-sobytiya-kazakhstana-v-vospriyatii-naseleniya-strany (дата обращения: 18.07.2022).
Copyright (c) 2022 Анна Дмитриевна Дерендяева
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Izvestiya of Altai State University is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.
Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at biological or scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.
Izvestiya of Altai State University allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission to Izvestiya of Altai State University) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).