Slavophiles on the European Enlightenment and the Reforms of Peter the Great as Causes of the Transformation of Russian Cultural Identity and Historical Memory
УДК 94(47):930.85 ББК 63.3(2)521.2-72
Abstract
The author addresses the problems of the correlation between the national and the global (universal) in the cultural identity of Russia, as well as the interaction of tradition and modernization in the development of all spheres of Russian society. The article presents the position of the founders of the ideology of Slavophilism — A.S. Khomyakov, I.V. Kireevsky and J. F. Samarin. In the conditions of Russian autocracy in the middle of the 19th century Slavophiles demonstrated double civil courage, opposing their point of view to the state conservatism and state modernization. The attitude of Slavophile thinkers to the reforms of Peter the Great as a turning point in the history of Russian society and state, as well as in the formation of national selfconsciousness is shown. There were disagreements between Slavophiles in assessing the state of pre-Petrine Russia. However, the most important negative consequence of Peter's reforms and uncritical borrowing of the Western enlightenment was seen by all Slavophile authors as a split in Russia's cultural identity: the separation of educated society from the people and separation of the state from society. The Slavophiles associated the bridging of this gap with two factors. Firstly, with a revival of the Russian Enlightenment based on a synthesis of the national spiritual tradition and the universal achievements of Western civilization. Secondly, with the implementation of social and political reforms “from above”, first of all — with the abolition of serfdom.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Осипов И.Д. Проблема народности науки в полемике славянофилов и западников // Вече: альманах русской философии и культуры. 2009. Вып. 19.
Касаткин П.И. Предпосылки формирования философии образования в России // Контекст и рефлексия: философия о мире и человеке. 2017. Т. 6. № 6А.
Иларион. Слово о законе и благодати // Русская идея. М., 1992.
Филофей. Послания старца Филофея // Электронные публикации Института русской литературы (Пушкинского Дома) РАН. URL: http://lib.pushkinskijdom.ru/ Default.aspx?tabid=5105.
Достоевский Ф.М. Пушкин // Русская идея. М., 1992.
Соловьев В.С. Русская идея // Соловьев В.С. Смысл любви: Избранные произведения. М., 1991.
Бердяев Н.А. Русская идея. Основные проблемы русской философской мысли XIX века и начала XX века // О России и русской философской культуре. М., 1990.
Гулыга А.В. Русская идея и ее творцы М., 1995.
Кожинов В.В. О русском национальном сознании. М., 2002. URL: https://profilib.net/chtenie/128145/vadim-kozhinov-o-russkom-natsionalnom-soznanii-80.php#t1.
Корольков А. А. Русская духовная философия. Духовный смысл русской культуры. СПб., 2006.
Лихачев Д.С. Раздумья о России. СПб., 2006.
Маслин М.А. «Велико незнанье России.» // Русская идея. М., 1992.
Панарин А.С. Россия в циклах мировой истории. М., 1999.
Янов А.Л. Россия и Европа 1462-1921 : в 3 кн. М., 2007.
Беленчук Л. Н. Просвещение России: взгляд западников и славянофилов. М., 2014.
Парилов О.В. Педагогические воззрения славянофилов и современная реформа российского высшего образования // Современные проблемы науки и образования. 2015. № 6. URL: http://science-education.ru/ru/article/ view?id=23327.
Киреевский И.В. Избранные статьи. М., 1984.
Хомяков А.С. По поводу статьи И.В. Киреевского «О характере просвещения Европы и его отношении к просвещению России» // Благова Т.И. Родоначальники славянофильства. Алексей Хомяков и Иван Киреевский. М., 1995.
Хомяков А.С. Сочинения : в 2 т. М., 1994. Т. 1.
Самарин Ю.Ф. Сочинения. М., 1877. Т. 1.
Хомяков А.С. Всемирная задача России. М., 2011.
Белинский В.Г. Собр. соч. М., 1982. Т. 9.
Хомяков А.С. Полн. собр. соч. М., 1900. Т. 1.
Киреевский И.В. Критика и эстетика. М., 1979.
Copyright (c) 2021 Марина Алексеевна Широкова
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Izvestiya of Altai State University is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.
Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at biological or scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.
Izvestiya of Altai State University allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission to Izvestiya of Altai State University) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).