Infliction of Harm at Detention of the Person Who Committed the Crime in the Explanations of the Plenums of the Supreme Courts of the USSR and the Russian Federation
Abstract
The article deals with the history of the legislative fixation of the infliction of the harm while detaining a person who committed a crime as a circumstance excluding the criminality of the deed. The legal sources and Resolutions of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the USSR and the Russian Federation are analyzed. The role of the explanations of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the USSR of 1969 and 1984, which are devoted to the issues of the necessary defense, in the elimination of partial gaps in the regulation of this circumstance by the Decree of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR of May 16, 1966 «On Increasing the Liability for Hooliganism», and then by the Decree of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the USSR of 1981 is shown. The importance of the resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of December 27, 2012 "On the application of Legislation by Courts on the Necessary Defense and Infliction of Harm While Detaining a Person Who committed a crime" in the elimination of the regulatory insufficiency of the criminal law provision envisaged by Art. 38 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation by specifying its content and thus ensuring the uniformity in judicial practice in the Russian Federation is highlighted. Based on the analysis of the explanations of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and of the foreign legislation a version of alteration to Part 2 of Art. 38 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation is proposed.
DOI 10.14258/izvasu(2018)3-19
Downloads
Metrics
References
О Верховном Суде Российской Федерации : Федеральный конституционный закон от 05.02.2014 № 3-ФКЗ (ред. от 15.02.2016, с изм. и доп., вступ. в силу с 01.01.2017) [Электронный ресурс]. — URL : http:// www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base= LAW&n=203252&rnd=31A22A11EF7A55E19A3F16BE DD940783#011761254716502267.
Лопашенко Н.А. Основы уголовно-правового воздействия: уголовное право, уголовный закон, уголовно-правовая политика. — СПб., 2004.
Коняхин В.П., Огородникова Н.В. Роль судебного толкования уголовного закона в процессе нормотворческой и правоприменительной деятельности // Международное и национальное уголовное законодательство: проблемы юридической техники. — М, 2004.
О судоустройстве РСФСР : Федеральный закон от 08.07.1981 (ред. 07.05.2009, утратил силу с 07.02.2010 в соответствии с ФКЗ-1) [Электронный ресурс]. — URL : http:// www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=LAW& n=87584&rnd=31A22A11EF7A55E19A3F16BEDD940783&di v=LAW&diff=110277&from=110277-81#06242612940994534.
Познышев С.В. Основные начала науки уголовного права. Общая часть уголовного права. — 2-е изд. — М., 1912.
Об усилении ответственности за хулиганство : Указ Президиума Верховного Совета СССР от 26.07.1966 // Ведомости ВС СССР. — 1966. — № 30. — Ст. 595.
Об усилении ответственности за хулиганство : Указ Президиума Верховного Совета СССР от 05.06.1981 // Ведомости ВС СССР. — 1981. — № 23. — Ст.782.
О практике применения судами законодательства о необходимой обороне : Постановление Пленума Верховного Суда СССР от 04.12.1969 // Сборник Постановлений Пленума Верховного Суда СССР. 1924-1973. — М., 1974.
О применении судами законодательства, обеспечивающего право на необходимую оборону от общественно опасного посягательства : Постановление Пленума Верховного Суда СССР // Сборник постановлений Пленумов Верховных Судов СССР и РСФСР (Российской Федерации) по уголовным делам. — М., 1995.
О применении судами законодательства о необходимой обороне и причинении вреда при задержании лица, совершившего преступление : Постановление Пленума Верховного Суда Российской Федерации от 27.09.2012 № 19 // Бюллетень Верховного Суда РФ. — 2012. — № 11.
Уголовный кодекс Украины 2001 г. — СПб., 2001.
Copyright (c) 2018 Л.Н. Смирнова, В.А. Мазуров
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Izvestiya of Altai State University is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.
Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at biological or scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.
Izvestiya of Altai State University allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission to Izvestiya of Altai State University) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
