Evaluation of Subjective Utility Function Parameters
Abstract
The paper presents a method of quantitative evaluation of subjective utility function parameters for investment decision-making process. The proposed method allows quantitative evaluation of two factors: the individual risk aversion and individual disposition toward lost business opportunities. Both factors are the main psychological aspects that can be observed during a decisionmaking process under uncertainty and risk. The effectiveness of an investment project is evaluated by NPV index. This index is considered a random variable that can be estimated by an investor as an interval [NPV1; NPV2 ]. Main difficulties in decision-making process arise when [NPV1; NPV2 ] interval includes a zero value. The mathematical model for decision-making process optimization was developed and proposed in this paper. The model is based on subjective utility function with two parameters: β and γ. Coefficient β is used for quantitative evaluation of fear of financial losses and coefficient γ is used for evaluation of regret of profit loss. The method of quantitative evaluation of β and γ is a test with 10 questions. Peculiarities of test questions are discussed, and calculation process of sought coefficients is presented.Downloads
References
Жариков А.В., Матюнин Е.В., Оскорбин Н.М. Подход к формализации задач поддержки принятия решений при информационных ограничениях // Известия Алтайского гос. ун-та. - 2014. - № 1-2. D0I:10.14258/izvasu(2014)1.2-15
Трифонов Ю.В., Плеханова А.Ф., Юрлов Ф.Ф. Выбор эффективных решений в экономике в условиях неопределенности. - Н. Новгород, 1998.
Корпоративный менеджмент [Электронный ресурс]. - URL: http://www.cfin.ru/finanalysis/koshechkin.shtml.
Шапкин А.С., Шапкин В.А. Теория риска и моделирование рисковых ситуаций. - М., 2005.
Ван Хорн Дж. Основы управления финансами / пер. с англ. под ред. И.И. Елисеевой. - М., 1997.
Данько Е. В. Функция полезности инвестиционных проектов в условиях неопределенности // МАК-2013 : сборник тр. XVI регион. конф. по математике. - Барнаул, 2013.
Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk // Econometrica. - 1979. - Vol. 47.
Tversky A., Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice // Science. - 1981. - № 211.
Tversky A., Kahneman D. Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model // The Quarterly Journal of Economics. - 1991. - Vol. 106. - No. 4.
Данько Е.В. Функция субъективной полезности инвестиционных решений в условиях информационной неопределенности и метод оценки ее параметров // Вестник Новосибирского гос. ун-та. Сер. Информационные технологии. - 2015. - Т. 13, вып. 3.
Izvestiya of Altai State University is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.
Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at biological or scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.
Izvestiya of Altai State University allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission to Izvestiya of Altai State University) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).



