History of the Study of Chinese Traditional Architecture in the 20th Century : Specificity of Tang Dynasty Cult Objects

УДК 94(510):72.03(510) ББК 63.3(5Кит)6 + 85.113(5Кит)

  • E.I. Varova Altai State University (Barnaul, Russia) Email: elena-varova@mail.ru
  • R.M. Ziganshin Institute of Oriental Studies RAS (Moscow, Russia) Email: rinatzigan@mail.ru
Keywords: history of temple architecture, PRC, culture, Tang Dynasty

Abstract

The relevance of the study is conditioned by the need to study Chinese religious buildings in order to identify the specifics of the construction of temple complexes, to reveal the features inherent in ancient temple buildings. The experience of studying temple complexes of the Tang dynasty in the context of historical research in China in the 20th century is analyzed. The monument of Buddhist Tang architecture — Foguang temple is considered. The socio-economic situation in China in the 20th century formed special conditions for the development of institutes, faculties for the study of temple building. The process of adaptation of architects to the new conditions after the Cultural Revolution was not unequivocal, as most of the temple buildings were destroyed. Only a small part of China's history remained imprinted in cult architecture, which had to be studied. As a result of historical research, new sources appear, and previously unstudied temples are introduced into scientific circulation. Among the Chinese architects of the 20th century were real connoisseurs of Chinese culture, who collected unique objects of ancient architecture, which became part of the world cultural heritage. It is concluded that in each historical epoch of temple building had its own distinctive features; temple architecture became a standard of power and might of emperors of this or that period, allowing us today to judge the achievements and knowledge of ancient architects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

E.I. Varova, Altai State University (Barnaul, Russia)

кандидат искусствоведения, доцент кафедры востоковедения

R.M. Ziganshin, Institute of Oriental Studies RAS (Moscow, Russia)

кандидат философских наук, научный сотрудник

References

История Китая: учебник. 2-e изд., испр. и доп. М., 2002.

Китайская Народная Республика: политика, экономика, культура. 2014-2015. М., 2016.

Куликов Б.Н. Архитектура и строительство Китая // Архитектура и строительство Ленинграда. 1956. № 2.

Фиджеральд С.П. Китай. Краткая история культуры. СПб., 1998.

Xiao Mo. Chinese Architecture. Beijing, 1999.

Лоу Цинси. Двадцать лекций по древней архитектуре Китая. М., 2010.

Чжу Чан-чжун. Характерные черты китайской архитектуры // Архитектура СССР. 1955. № 8.

Кривцов В.А. Эстетика даосизма. М., 1993.

Yanxin C. Chinese Architecture: Palaces, Gardens, Temples and Dwellings. Beijing. 2010.

Лян Сы-чэн. Великие традиции и наследство архитектуры Китая // Архитектура в СССР. 1953. № 7.

图解中国著名佛教寺院/张权寰著. — 北京: 当代中国出版社, 2012 (Чжан Цюаньхуан.Знаменитые буддийские монастыри. Пекин, 2012).

Лоу Цинси. Традиционная архитектура Китая. Пекин, 2002.

Чун Яту. Секрет «устойчивости в течение тысячелетий» — традиционная китайская архитектура // Китай. 2013. № 11(97).

清式营造则例 / 梁思成著. — 北京: 清华大学出版社. 2006 (Лян Сычэн. Архитектурные правила династии Цин. Пекин, 2006).

Кулемзин А.М. Охрана памятников России (теория, история, методика). Кемерово, 2013.

Published
2023-12-09
How to Cite
Varova E., Ziganshin R. History of the Study of Chinese Traditional Architecture in the 20th Century : Specificity of Tang Dynasty Cult Objects // Izvestiya of Altai State University, 2023, № 5(133). P. 42-47 DOI: 10.14258/izvasu(2023)5-06. URL: http://izvestiya.asu.ru/article/view/%282023%295-06.
Section
Всеобщая история. Специальные исторические дисциплины