Possible Ways of Improving the Mediation Process in the Russian Federation at the Present Stage

  • N.A. Samohvalov The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (Balakovo, Russia) Email: nikolai-samohvalov@yandex.ru
  • Yu.A. Virchenko The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (Balakovo, Russia ) Email: yuliya-virchenko@yandex.ru
DOI_disc_logo https://doi.org/10.14258/izvasu(2018)6-36
Keywords: alternative ways of settlement of legal disputes,, alternative ways of settlement of legal disputes, mediation procedure, the mediator, obstacles, novelties

Abstract

Over the last decade in the Russian Federation there is a systematic and progressive development of the civil and civil-procedural legislation with a view to improve its efficiency and effectiveness. One of the most progressive aspects in this area was the introduction of an alternative procedure for the settlement of legal disputes with the participation of an intermediary (mediation procedure) into the legal field of Russia and consolidation at the legal level. Since the adoption of the Federal law of July 27, 2010 № 193-FZ "“On the Alternative Procedure for the Settlement of Disputes with the Participation of a Mediator (mediation procedure)” enough time has passed to analyze the existing problems in the practical application of mediation as the main alternative to judicial settlement of legal disputes and to determine the possible prospects for its development. In this context, the authors of the present article reasonably determine the existing organizational and legal obstacles to the formation of the mediation procedure as an effective out-of-court (alternative) method of settlement of legal disputes. The authors conclude that the mediation procedure occupied a certain niche in the legal field of Russia. The authors pay special attention to possible legislative innovations to improve the use of mediation procedures in the Russian Federation in the short and long term as the main alternative to judicial settlement of legal disputes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

N.A. Samohvalov, The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (Balakovo, Russia)

старший преподаватель кафедры правового обеспечения управления Балаковского филиала

Yu.A. Virchenko, The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (Balakovo, Russia )

старший преподаватель кафедры правового обеспечения управления Балаковского филиала

References

Абова Т.Е. Альтернативные формы разрешения споров нужны для удобства сторон, а не ради снижения нагрузки на судей // Арбитражная практика. — 2011. — № 3.

Загайнова С.К. Медиация в России : законодательство и практика : тез. докл. // Российский ежегодник гражданского и арбитражного процесса. — 2013. — № 10–11.

Первухина С.И. Зарубежный опыт дифференциации процедур досудебного урегулирования налоговых споров // Арбитражный и гражданский процесс. — 2017. — № 8.

Шамликашвили Ц.А. Медиация — это способ сделать наш мир немного лучше и безопаснее // Вестник федерального института медиации. — 2017. — № 1.

Самохвалов Н.А. Концептуальные идеи и модель института медиации в современной России // Юрист. — 2015. — № 2.

Самохвалов Н.А., Вирченко Ю.А. Правовые препятствия применения института медиации в России и пути их устранения // Юрист. — 2017. — № 11.

О внесении изменений в отдельные законодательные акты Российской Федерации в целях совершенствования медиативной практики : проект Федерального закона №290871-7 // СПС «КонсультантПлюс».

Об образовании в Российской Федерации : Федеральный закон от 29 декабря 2012 г. № 273-Ф3 // СПС «КонсультантПлюс».

Об альтернативной процедуре урегулирования споров с участием посредника (процедуре медиации) : Федеральный закон от 27 июля 2010 г. № 193-ФЗ // СПС «КонсультантПлюс».

Гражданский процессуальный кодекс Российской Федерации от 14 ноября 2002 г. № 138-ФЗ // СПС «КонсультантПлюс».

Арбитражный процессуальный кодекс Российской Федерации от 24 июля 2002 г. № 95-ФЗ // СПС «КонсультантПлюс».

Published
2018-12-10
How to Cite
Samohvalov N., Virchenko Y. Possible Ways of Improving the Mediation Process in the Russian Federation at the Present Stage // Izvestiya of Altai State University, 2018, № 6(104). P. 192-196 DOI: 10.14258/izvasu(2018)6-36. URL: http://izvestiya.asu.ru/article/view/%282018%296-36.
Issue
No 6(104) (2018): Izvestiya of Altai State University
Section
Частное право

Izvestiya of Altai State University is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.

Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at biological or scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.

Izvestiya of Altai State University allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission to Izvestiya of Altai State University) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).