Impact or Staging of 1912 in Deterioration of the German-British Relations in Pre-war Years
Abstract
The article analyzes the development of German-British maritime contradictions in the short period of 1904-1912 in the context of determining the position of the upper date in the history of relations between the two countries in the pre-war period. The thesis about the fateful character of 1912, presented in the research literature, seems to be exaggerated to some extent. Based on the available published data and materials from the German Military Archive (Freiburg — BA-MA.RM) it is shown that the first serious aggravation, due to the rapid development of the German fleet on the basis of the law of 1900, arose in 1904-1905, due the real danger of a military confrontation. The subsequent "dreadnought revolution" committed by the British in 1905 only further exacerbated this general trend and gave the naval arms race a new impetus. Berlin answered to the dreadnought challenge, thrown by the British, with the novels of 1906, 1908, 1912. The Germans used them as a try to translate into reality the thesis, formulated by the Naval State Secretary A. Tirpitz, formulated at the end of the 19th century — he offered to make a fleet that would be 2/3 of the power of the British one. The attempts, made by both sides in the period of 1908-1912 to achieve a mutually satisfactory treaty on naval armaments, failed. The reason for this is the maximization by the Germans and the British of their military and political demands in the negotiations and the lack of desire for compromise. The mission of the English Military Minister R. Holden to Berlin in February 1912 demonstrated the last unrealized chance to come to an agreement. On the basis of the analysis of all the events of 1904-1912, it is concluded that 1912 was not so desperately fateful and did not predetermine the major war as a result, but a turning point, although completing the stage of the general process of deteriorating relations between the two states.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Fischer F. Die Neutralität Englands als Ziel deutscher Politik, 1908/09-1914 // Von der freien Gemeinde zum föderalistischen Europa. — West Berlin, 1983.
Berghahn V. R. Der Tirpitz-Plan. Genesis und Verfall einer innenpolitischen Krisenstrategie unter Wilhelm II. — Düsseldorf, 1971.
Epkenhans M. Die wilhelminische Flottenrüstung.
–1914. Weltmachtstreben, industrieller Fortschritt, soziale Integration. — München, 1991.
Förster S. Der doppelte Militarismus. Die deutsche Heeresrüstungspolitik zwischen Status-Quo-Sicherung und Agression 1890–1913. — Wiesbaden, 1985.
Kennedy P. M. The Rise of the Anglo-German Antagonism 1860–1914. — L., 1982.
Хвостов В.М. История дипломатии. Т. 2: Дипломатия в новое время, 1871–1914 / под ред. А.А. Громыко [ и др.]. 2-е изд., перераб. и доп. — М., 1963.
Шацило К.Ф. Русский империализм и развитие флота накануне Первой мировой войны (1906–1914 гг.). — М., 1968.
Грибовский В.Ю., Познахирев В.П. Вице-адмирал З.П. Рожественский. — СПб., 1999.
BA-MA. RM 3/4. Bendemann’ Aufzeichnung. Gedanken über die augenblicksche kritische Lage vom 03. 12. 1904.
BA-MA. RM 3/4. Vollerthun’ Aufzeichnung. Politische und militarische Betrachtungen über einen englischdeutschen Krieg. 27. 11. 1904.
BA-MA. RM 3/4. Denkschrift des Admiralstabes über die Kriegsführung gegen England vom 01.01.1905.
Вторая конференция мира. Гаагская конференция 1907. — СПб., 1908.
Deutsche Reichsgeschichte in Dokumenten. Urkunden und Aktenstücke zur Inneren und Äuβeren Politik des Deutschen Reiches. Bd. 1. T. 1: 1849–1906.
Chemnitzer Allgemeine Zeitung. 02.04.1908.
BA-MA. RM 3/2790. Widenmann an Tirpitz über Briefwechsel zum Two-Power-Standart zwischen Lord Tweedmouth und Earl Cawdor. 20.03.1908.
Hubatsch W. Der Admiralstab und die obersten Marinebehörden in Deutschland 1848–1945. — Frankfurt a. M., 1958.
Fischer J. Memories. — L., 1919.
BA-MA. RM 3/41. Ballins Unterredung mit Cassel über deutsch-englische Verfremdung. 20.06.1908.
Бюлов Б. Воспоминания. — М. ; Л., 1935.
BA-MA. RM 3/2792. Widenmann an Tirpitz über Lord Roberts Warnrede im House of Lords. 24.11.1908.
BA-MA. RM 2/1762. Tirpitz’ Aufzeichnungtn über Immediatvortrag vom 03. 04. 1909.
BA-MA. Freiburg, Nachlaβ Tirpitz. № 253/24 b.
Доливо-Добровольский Б. Иностранное обозрение. Неофициальный отдел // Морской сборник. — 1912. — № 5.
Жерве Б. Германия и ее морская сила. Неофициальный отдел // Морской сборник. — 1914. — № 9.
Izvestiya of Altai State University is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.
Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at biological or scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.
Izvestiya of Altai State University allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission to Izvestiya of Altai State University) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).