The Problems of Foreign Pharmacists’ Integration into Russian Medical Practice in the XVI–XVIIth Centuries
Abstract
The article considers the influence of Russian political, social, economical and religious background, as well as domestic law tradition on the process of emergence and activity of Western European medical representatives in the Russian state in the XVI-XVIIth centuries. Integration of foreign doctors and pharmacists in the domestic medical practice was possible only as one of the results of the process of centralization of the Russian state. The only appearance of professional European druggists did not mean the development of pharmaceutical business. Russian political, social and economic system did not allow the foreigners to be freely engaged in private practice. As a result, in the Russia of the XVI-XVIIth centuries the druggists found themselves in social, cultural, professional and, as a result, economic isolation. Nevertheless the appearance and development of Russian monarchy accompanied in XVI-XVIIth centuries with formation of the central and local government system (Prikazy, guby, etc.), fiscal and monetary reforms, military reforms based on the European model became the required prerequisites for the governmental interest to the questions of first of all formation of medical support system and then creating of governmental administrative management system for state medicine. As the result European professional and legal principles were integrated into Russian medical practice and legislation, foreign physicians and pharmacists were incorporated into the Russian social and economic environment during these processes.
DOI 10.14258/izvasu(2015)4.1-35
Downloads
Metrics
References
Мирский М.Б. Медицина в России XVI-XIX вв. -М., 1996.
Сало В.М. История фармации в России. - М., 2007.
Лахтин М.Ю. Медицина и врачи в Московском государстве (в до-Петровской Руси). - М., 1906.
Загоскин Н.П. Врачи и врачебное дело в старинной России. - Казань, 1891.
Рихтер В.М. История медицины в России. - М., 1814. - Т. 2.
Щапов Я.Н. Византийское и южнославянское правовое наследие на Руси XI-XIII вв. - М., 1978.
Очерки русской культуры XVI в. / под ред. А.В. Арциховского. - М., 1976. - Ч. I-II.
Владимирский-Буданов М. Хрестоматия по истории русского права. - Вып. 1. - Киев, 1885.
Русская историческая библиотека. Т. 6. Ч. 1.: Памятники древнерусского канонического права (XI-XV в.). - 2-е изд. - СПб., 1908.
Милюков П. Очерки по истории русской культуры. - СПб., 1896. - Ч. I.
Unkovskay M.V Learning foreign mysteries; Russian pupils of the Aptekarskii Prikaz, 1650-1700 // Oxford Slavonic Papers. London; Toronto, 1997.
Орленко С.П. Выходцы из Западной Европы в России XVII века // Вопросы истории. - 2000. - № 6.
Опарина Т.А. Иноземцы в России XVI-XVII вв. Очерки исторической биографии и генеалогии. - М., 2007.
Лебедев А.Л. Служилые иноземцы в России XVII в. (1613-1689). Ярославль, 1998.
Милюков П. Очерки по истории русской культуры. - Вып. 1. - СПб., 1901. - Ч. 3.
Скобелкин О.В. Прием «выходцев на государево имя» в XVI - начале XVII века // Иноземцы в России в XV-XVII веках. - М., 2006.
Куприянова О.И. Правовое положение иностранцев в России в XVI-XVIII вв. : автореф. дис. канд. юрид. наук. - М., 2010.
Мулюкин А.С. Иностранцы свободных профессий в Московском государстве // Журнал Министерства народного просвещения. - 1908. - Ч. 7.
Мулюкин А.С. О свободе приезда иностранцев в Московское государство // Журнал Министерства народного просвещения. - 1908. - Ч. 40.
Лаппо-Данилевский А.С. Иноземцы в России в царствование Михаила Федоровича // Журнал Министерства народного просвещения. - 1885. - Ч. 241.
Акты исторические, собранные и изданные Археографической комиссией (АИ). - СПб., 1841. - Т. 3. - № 161, 233.
Зимин А.А. Состав русских городов XVI в. // Исторические записки. - Т. 64. - 1959.
Полное собрание законов Российской империи. Собрание Первое. 1649-1825 гг. (ПСЗРИ). - СПб., 1830. - Т. 1. - № 607, 1117.
Российский государственный архив древних актов (РГАДА). - Ф. 143. - Оп. 2. - Д. 640.
Новомбергский Н.Я. Врачебное строение в допетровской Руси. - Томск, 1907.
Полное собрание русских летописей. - Т. 13., ч. 1. - СПб., 1904.
Чтения в императорском Обществе истории и древностей российских при Московском университете. - М., 1858. - Кн. 2.
Зимин А.А. И.С. Пересветов и его современники. - М., 1958.
РГАДА. - Ф. 143. - Оп. 1. - Д. 29.
Акты Московского государства (АМГ). - СПб., 1901. - Т. 3. № 279, 283.
АИ. - СПб., 1841. - Т. 3. - № 303.
АМГ. - СПб., 1890. - Т. 1. - № 92, 107, 405.
АМГ. - СПб., 1901. - Т. 3. - № 21, 28.
РГАДА. - Ф. 143. - Оп. 2. - Д. 116.
Михайлова И. По усам текло. что в казну попало? // Родина. - 2014. - № 2
Материалы для истории медицины. - № 1375. - Вып. 4.
Izvestiya of Altai State University is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.
Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at biological or scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.
Izvestiya of Altai State University allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission to Izvestiya of Altai State University) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).