The Near East Epipaleolithic: Review of Research Concepts

  • К.А. Колобова Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography of the Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (Novosibirsk, Russia); Altai State University (Barnaul, Russia); Email: kolobovak@yandex.ru
  • С.В. Шнайдер Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography of the Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (Novosibirsk, Russia); Altai State University (Barnaul, Russia); Novosibirsk State University (Novosibirsk, Russia) Email: sveta.shnayder@gmail.com
  • А.И. Кривошапкин Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography of the Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (Novosibirsk, Russia); Altai State University (Barnaul, Russia); Novosibirsk State University (Novosibirsk, Russia) Email: shapkin@archaeology.nsc.ru
Keywords: Levant, Epipaleolithic, chronology, stages, technological innovations, cross-cultural interactions

Abstract

Currently Levant Epipaleolithic is the best studied territory in terms of the sites quantity, reconstructed technologies, settlements and burial complexes, non-use activity objects; and environment reconstructions. Its study has a great importance due to the emergence of new hypotheses of the genesis and development of the Western Central Asia Upper Paleolithic and Mesolithic. The present work is devoted to coverage of the basic concepts of Late Pleistocene-Early Holocene complexes of the Middle East in the foreign historiography. The article discusses the term “Epipaleolithic”, its application and interpretation; the questions of chronology and stages of Epipaleolithic industries; the questions of early technological innovations and their further spread on the territory under study, the questions of cross-cultural interactions between the ancient populations. At each highlighted Levant Epipaleolithic chronological, records have been made of considerable variability of complexes which expressed through a large variety of typological and technological non-geometric and geometric microliths. This variability is interpreted as the results of climate change adaptation, associated with the last glacial maximum, or as human groups’ adaptation to certain environmental conditions.

DOI 10.14258/izvasu(2015)3.2-16

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

References

Кривошапкин А.И. Обирахматский вариант перехода от среднего к верхнему палеолиту : автореф. дис.. д-ра ист. наук. - Новосибирск, 2012.

Колобова К.А. Верхний палеолит Западного Памиро-Тянь-Шаня : автореф. дис.. д-ра ист. наук. - Новосибирск, 2014.

Pirie A. Chipped Stone Variability and Approaches to Cultural Classification in the Epipaleolithic of the South Levantine arid Zone. A Thesis Submitted for the Degree “Doctor of Philosophy” / Department of Archaeology. - 2001.

Richter T. Marginal Landscapes? The Azraq Oasis and the Cultural Landscapes of the Final Pleistocene Southern Levant. - L., 2009.

Окладников А.П. Палеолит и мезолит Средней Азии // Средняя Азия в эпоху камня и бронзы. - 1966.

Коробкова Г.Ф. Мезолит Средней Азии и Казахстана // Мезолит СССР. - М., 1989.

Ранов В.А. Каменный век Южного Таджикистана и Памира : автореф. дис.. д-ра ист. наук. - Новосибирск, 1988.

Филимонова Т.Г. Верхний палеолит и мезолит афгано-таджикской депрессии : автореф. дис.. канд. ист. наук. - Душанбе, 2007.

Bar-Yosef O. The Epi-Paleolithic Cultures of Palestine. Thesis Submitted for the Degree “Doctor of Philosophy”. - Jerusalim, 1970.

McDonald D.A. Interpreting Variability through Multiple Methodologies: The Interplay of Form and Function in Epipalaeolithic Microliths. A Thesis Submitted for the Degree “Doctor of Philosophy” / Department of Anthropology University of Toronto. - 2013.

Bar-Yosef O. On the Nature of Transitions: the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic and the Neolithic Revolution // Cambridge Archaeological Journal. - 1998. - Vol. 8/2.

Belfer-Cohen A., Gorring-Morris N. The Upper Paleolithic and Earlier Epi-Paleolithic of Western Asia // In The Cambridge World Prehistory. - Cambridge, 2013. - Vol. 3.

Maher L.A., Richter T., Stock J.T. The Pre-Natufian Epipaleolithic: Long-Term Behavioral Trends in the Levant // Evolutionary Anthropology. - 2012. - Vol. 21.

Richter T., Maher L.A. Terminology, Process and Change: Reflections on the Epipalaeolithic of South-west Asia // Levant. - 2013. - Vol. 45. - № 2.

Belfer-Cohen A., Gorring-Morris N. Why Microliths? Microlithization in the Levant // Thinking Small. - 2002.

Gilead I. Is the Term “Epipalaeolithic” Relevant to Levantine Prehistory? // Current Anthropology. - 1984. - № 25 (2).

Gilead I. The Upper Palaeolithic to Epi-Palaeolithic Transition in the Levant // Paleorient. - 1988. - № 14 (2).

Bar-Yosef O. The Last Glacial Maximum in the Mediterranean Levant // The World at 18,000 BP, eds. O. Soffer & C. Gamble Unwin Hyman. - 1989.

Bar-Yosef O., Vogel J.C. Relative and Absolute Chronology of the Epipalaeolithic in the Southern Levant // Chronology of the Near East, eds. O. Aurenche, J. Evin & F. Hours. - Oxford., 1987. - № 379.

Byrd B.F. Late Quaternary Hunter-Gatherer Complexes in the Levant between 20,000 and 10,000 BP // Late Quaternary Chronology and Paleoclimates of the Eastern Mediterranean. - 1994.

Goring-Morris A.N. Complex Hunter/Gatherers at the End of the Paleolithic // The Archaeology of Society in the Holy Land. Red. T. Levy. - L., 1995.

Goring-Morris A.N., Belfer-Cohen A. The Articulation of Cultural Processes and Late Quaternary Environmental Changes in Cisjordan // Paleorient. - 1998. - Vol. 23.

Henry D.O. Prehistoric Cultural Ecology and Evolution. Insights from Southern Jordan. - New York, 1995.

Shea J. Stone Tools in Paleolithic and Neolithic Near East - New York, 2013.

Nadel D. The Ohalo II Flint Assemblage and the Beginning of the Epipalaeolithic in the Jordan Valley // More than Meets the Ezye: Studies on Upper Paleolithic Diversity in the Near East. - Oxford, 2003.

Yaroshevich A., Nadel D., Tsatskin A. Composite Projectiles and Hafting Technologies at Ohalo II (23 ka, Israel): Analyses of Impact Fractures, Morphometric Characteristics and Adhesive Remains on Microlithic Tools // Journal of Archaeological Science. - 2013. - Vol. 40/11.

Yaroshevich A., Kaufman D., Nuzhnyy D., Bar-Yo-sef O., Weinsteiner-Evron M. Design and Performance of Microlith Implemented Projectiles during the Middle and the Late Epipaleolithic of the Levant Experimental and Archaeological Evidence // Jornal of Archaelogical Science. - 2010. - № 37.

Richter T., Garrard A.N., Allock S., Maher L.A. Interaction before Agriculture: Exchanging Material and Sharing Knowledge in the Final Pleistocene Levant // Cambridge Archaeological Journal. - 2010. - Vol. 21/1.

Olszewski D. A Reassessment of Average Lunate Length as a Chronological Marker // Paleorient. - 1986. - Vol. 21.

Goring-Morris A.N., Belfer-Cohen A. Neolithization Processes in the Levant: the Outer Envelope // Current Anthropology. - 2012. - № 52.

How to Cite
Колобова К., Шнайдер С., Кривошапкин А. The Near East Epipaleolithic: Review of Research Concepts // Izvestiya of Altai State University, 1, № 3/2(87) DOI: 10.14258/izvasu(2015)3.2-16. URL: http://izvestiya.asu.ru/article/view/%282015%293.2-16.