Private Capital in the Railway Construction Process in Turkestan (70s of the 19th -Early 20th Centuries)

УДК 94(575.4):625.1 ББК 63.3(5Тур)+39

  • I.B. Bochkareva Altai State University (Barnaul, Russia) Email: portnygina@yandex.ru
Keywords: the Russian Empire, Turkestan, private initiative, railways, modernization

Abstract

The state and private capital, mainly foreign, were the main actors of Russian railway network creating process in the post-reform period. At the same time, in Turkestan, the Russian Government consciously discouraged private initiatives in the field of railway construction for a long time, preventing private capital from acquiring the quality of an actor along with the state. Although the government maintained a policy of building railways in the region at the Treasury expense, since the 1870s it has regularly received applications for the right to build Railways on the terms of private concessions. The article examines the content of private railway projects and the nature of concession rights that entrepreneurs requested from the government. The author comes to the conclusion that most of them preceded the state's decisions on the railway line construction in Turkestan, as in the case of the Trans-Caspian railway line extension from Samarkand to Tashkent and Andijan. In this regard, private initiative played a role as a factor in the state's decision - making process on the further development of the region's railway network.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

I.B. Bochkareva, Altai State University (Barnaul, Russia)

кандидат исторических наук, доцент кафедры востоковедения

References

Гиндин И.Ф. Государственный банк и экономическая политика правительства. М., 1960.

Акторы российской имперской модернизации (XVIII - начало XX в.): региональное измерение. Екатеринбург, 2016.

Тогаева А.З. Дорога Ташкент - Оренбург и ее место в социально-экономической жизни Туркестана : автореф. дис. ... канд. ист. наук. Ташкент, 2010. URL: http://netess.ru/3istoriya/269295-1-6251-575-09-togaeva-anoroy-zayniddinovna-zheleznaya-doroga-tashkent-orenburg-mesto-socialno-ekonomicheskoy-zhizni-tur.php.

РГИА (Российский государственный исторический архив). Ф. 954. Оп. 1. Д. 126.

РГИА. Ф. 268. Оп. 1. Д. 230.

Письмо министра путей сообщения генерал-лейтенанта графа А.П. Бобринского в Министерство иностранных дел о проекте Ф. Лессепса. URL: http://www.vostlit.info/Texts/Dokumenty/Indien/XVIII/1780-1800/Russ_ind_19/41-60/58.phtml?id=15830.

Бочкарева И.Б. Железнодорожное строительство в стратегии Российской империи по освоению Туркестана // Известия Алтайского гос. ун-та. 2019. № 5(109).

Вестник финансов, промышленности и торговли. 1892. № 39.

Путеводитель по Туркестану и железным дорогам Среднеазиатской и Ташкентской / под ред. А.И. Дмитриева-Мамонова. СПб., 1913.

Витте С.Ю. Собрание сочинений и документальных материалов. Т. 1, кн. 2, ч. 2. М., 2006.

РГИА. Ф. 268. Оп. 3. Д. 695. О соединении Сибирской железной дороги со Среднеазиатской (1898-1903 гг.).

Published
2020-11-30
How to Cite
Bochkareva I. Private Capital in the Railway Construction Process in Turkestan (70s of the 19th -Early 20th Centuries) // Izvestiya of Altai State University, 2020, № 5(115). P. 13-18 DOI: 10.14258/izvasu(2020)5-01. URL: http://izvestiya.asu.ru/article/view/%282020%295-01.
Section
Отечественная история