Urban Land Improvement and Housing Problem in the Krasnoyarsk Krai in the Second Half of the 1950-s — the Beginning of the 1980-s

  • Н.В. Гонина Krasnoyarsk State Agrarian University (Krasnoyarsk, Russia) Email: nvg7@mail.ru
DOI_disc_logo https://doi.org/10.14258/izvasu(2017)2-11(2017)2-01
Keywords: city, Krasnoyarsk Krai, dwelling, improvement, construction, second half of the 20th century

Abstract

Industrial reclaiming of the Krasnoyarsk Krai was accompanied by intensive urbanization in the second half of the 20th century. In the cities there was housing construction, analogs to which had not been reported before. Reports of the enterprises and the page of newspapers dazzled with high figures of houses commissioning. Having moved from cellars and barracks, many people for the first time had an opportunity to live in the well-planned apartments. However, it can be observed that the situation was rather difficult in the concrete cities. The major role was played by the township-forming enterprise. For example, cities of Minsredmash were built according to the general layout; consequently it had the centralized communications and site landscaping. At the same time ministries of the wood, gold and coal industry had no concern for provision of urban amenities in the settlement so much. А fast pace of construction demanded large volumes of production of building materials and a considerable amount of qualified workers. Initially such resources did not exist. Their creation demanded time and money. Heightened rates resulted in poor quality and losses. Very common was the low quality of interior decoration, an incomplete batching of the electro- and sanitary equipment, a delay in lying of communications; engineering networks were also overloaded which resulted in a high level of accident rate. The big influx of country migrants which doubled urban population for the affected period sharply increased the housing demand. In such situation it was almost not possible to satisfy escalating needs of the cities even in the developed southern areas, especially it was difficult in extreme conditions of the North.

DOI 10.14258/izvasu(2017)2-11

Downloads

Metrics

PDF views
206
Jan 1969Jul 1969Jan 1970Jul 1970Jan 1971Jul 1971Jan 1972Jul 1972Jan 1973Jul 1973Jan 1974Jul 1974Jan 1975Jul 1975Jan 1976Jul 1976Jan 1977Jul 1977Jan 1978Jul 1978Jan 1979Jul 1979Jan 1980Jul 1980Jan 1981Jul 1981Jan 1982Jul 1982Jan 1983Jul 1983Jan 1984Jul 1984Jan 1985Jul 1985Jan 1986Jul 1986Jan 1987Jul 1987Jan 1988Jul 1988Jan 1989Jul 1989Jan 1990Jul 1990Jan 1991Jul 1991Jan 1992Jul 1992Jan 1993Jul 1993Jan 1994Jul 1994Jan 1995Jul 1995Jan 1996Jul 1996Jan 1997Jul 1997Jan 1998Jul 1998Jan 1999Jul 1999Jan 2000Jul 2000Jan 2001Jul 2001Jan 2002Jul 2002Jan 2003Jul 2003Jan 2004Jul 2004Jan 2005Jul 2005Jan 2006Jul 2006Jan 2007Jul 2007Jan 2008Jul 2008Jan 2009Jul 2009Jan 2010Jul 2010Jan 2011Jul 2011Jan 2012Jul 2012Jan 2013Jul 2013Jan 2014Jul 2014Jan 2015Jul 2015Jan 2016Jul 2016Jan 2017Jul 2017Jan 2018Jul 2018Jan 2019Jul 2019Jan 2020Jul 2020Jan 2021Jul 2021Jan 2022Jul 2022Jan 2023Jul 2023Jan 2024Jul 2024Jan 2025Jul 2025Jan 202642
|

Author Biography

Н.В. Гонина, Krasnoyarsk State Agrarian University (Krasnoyarsk, Russia)
кандидат исторических наук, доцент кафедры истории и политологии

References

Levin M. La grande mutation sovietique. - Paris, 1989.

Опыт решения жилищной проблемы в городах Сибири в ХХ - начале XXI вв. - Новосибирск, 2008.

Рыженко В. Г Образы и символы советского города в современных исследовательских опытах: региональный аспект : монография. - Омск, 2010.

Жидченко А.В. История повседневной жизни районов массового жилищного строительства в Сибири как отражение социальной истории России середины ХХ века // «В надежде славы и добра..»: исторический факультет НГПУ в образовательном, исследовательском и социокультурном пространстве России : материалы Всероссийской научно-практической конференции, посвященной 80-летию НГПУ и исторического факультета (института истории, гуманитарного и социального образования). - Новосибирск, 2015.

Карпов В.П., Юдакова О.В. «Они как-нибудь там окопаются»: обустройство новоселов в «нефтяных городах» Тюменского Севера // Историческая урбанистика: прошлое и настоящее города : материалы Всероссийской конференции с международным участием. - Сургут, 2015.

Стась И.Н. Рождение нефтяных городов Ханты-Мансийского округа в период нефтегазового освоения Тюменской области // Архитектура и строительство России. - 2013. - № 6.

Даминев И. И. Развитие жилищного строительства в городах Башкирской АССР в 1965-1985 гг. // Научный журнал. - 2016. - № 4 (5).

Реут Г. А. Проблемы распределения жилья в закрытых городах Сибири в 1950-1980-х гг. // Вестник Красноярского государственного аграрного университета. - 2014. - № 2.

Кузнецов В.Н. Процесс строительства закрытых городов на Урале и их заселение жителями // Историческая демография. - 2014. - № 2 (14).

Государственный архив Красноярского края (ГАКК). - Ф.р-2290. - Оп. 1. - Д. 1.

ГАКК. - Ф.р-2290. - Оп. 1. - Д. 7.

Слабуха А. Норильск был задуман как система архитектурных ансамблей [Электронный ресурс]. - URL: http://archvestnik.ru/ru/magazine/ab-6-99-2007/norilsk-byl-zaduman-kak-sistema-arkhitekturnykh-ansamblei (дата обращения: 10.08.2016).

ГАКК. - Ф.п-26. - Оп. 34. - Д. 31.

Социальный паспорт Красноярского края. - Красноярск, 1977.

Народное хозяйство Красноярского края. - Красноярск, 1985.

ГАКК. - Ф р-17. - Оп.1. - Д. 1808.

ГАКК. - Ф р-17. - Оп. 1. - Д. 1804.

ГАКК. - Ф.п-26. - Оп. 34. - Д. 35.

ГАКК. - Ф.р-1386. - Оп. 1. - Д. 3364.

ГАКК. - Ф.р-1478. - Оп. 3. - Д. 358.

ГАКК. - Ф.р-1478. - Оп. 3. - Д. 440.

Народное хозяйство Красноярского края. - Красноярск, 1967.

ГАКК. - Ф. Ф п-26. - Оп. 8. - Д. 6.

ГАКК. - Ф.р-2278. - Оп. 1. - Д. 14.

ГАКК. - Ф.р-2224. - Оп. 2. - Д. 18.

ГАКК. - Ф р-2290. - Оп. 1. - Д. 367.

How to Cite
Гонина Н. Urban Land Improvement and Housing Problem in the Krasnoyarsk Krai in the Second Half of the 1950-s — the Beginning of the 1980-s // Izvestiya of Altai State University, 1, № 2(94) DOI: 10.14258/izvasu(2017)2-11(2017)2-01. URL: http://izvestiya.asu.ru/article/view/%282017%292-11%282017%292-01.
Issue
No 2(94) (2017): Известия Алтайского государственного университета
Section
Статьи

Izvestiya of Altai State University is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.

Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at biological or scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.

Izvestiya of Altai State University allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission to Izvestiya of Altai State University) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).