Study of Perforated Mica from the Initial Upper Paleolithic Complex in Mongolia: Traceological Analysis and 40Ar/39Ar Dating

УДК 902«6325»(517.3) ББК 63.442.12(5Мон)

  • A.M. Khatsenovich Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography of the Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (Novosibirsk, Russia) Email: archeomongolia@gmail.com
  • L.V. Zotkina Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography of the Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (Novosibirsk, Russia) Email: zotkina@archaeology.nsc.ru
  • R.A. Shelepaev V.S. Sobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy of the Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (Novosibirsk, Russia); Novosibirsk State University (Novosibirsk, Russia) Email: rshel@igm.nsc.ru
  • Ya.Yu. Shelepov V.S. Sobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy of the Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (Novosibirsk, Russia); Novosibirsk State University (Novosibirsk, Russia) Email: shelepov@igm.nsc.ru
  • B. Gunchinsuren Institute of Archaeology of Academy of Science of Mongolia (Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia) Email: bgunchinsuren@yahoo.com
  • D. Odsuren Institute of Archaeology of Academy of Science of Mongolia (Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia) Email: odsuren1983@gmail.com
  • E.P. Rybin Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography of the Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (Novosibirsk, Russia) Email: rybep@yandex.ru
  • D.W. Olsen University of Arizona (Tucson, USA) Email: olsenj@email.arizona.edu
Keywords: Mongolia, Initial Upper Paleolithic, traceology, 40Ar/39Ar dating, non-utilitarian item

Abstract

Sometimes the specific artefacts can be found in archaeological context that cannot be studied in the frame of classic approaches and methods because of their peculiarity. Small thin perforated flakelet of mica was found at the Kharganyn Gol 5 site in Northern Mongolia in 2015. Complex of horizon 5 where this flakelet was revealed, is determined as Initial Upper Paleolithic and dated to 38 000 years ago (uncalibrated). Since this finding does not fall within any typo-list of personal ornaments, we determined her as the nonutilitarian item. The usage of mica is known since Neolithic time, when ancient human added her pieces to the clay for ceramic. Later, during the Medieval Ages, mica became a good for trade, because it was used instead of window glass. Appearance of mica in Initial Upper Paleolithic context set a task to verify its anthropogenic modification, and, since the type of this particular mica — muscovite — is quite rare material, we spotted an opportunity to identify the original location, from which it was transported to Middle Selenga Basin. However, the only analysis of mica chemical composition was insufficient. Here we give an example of complex multidisciplinary study of mica item from the traceological and geochemical points of view. For the first time at the territory of Central Asia the source of stone raw material was determined by 40Ar/39Ar dating. The experimental perforating of muscovite is carried out first time in the world experimental archaeology and it draws out the specifics of this raw material modification.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

A.M. Khatsenovich, Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography of the Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (Novosibirsk, Russia)

кандидат исторических наук, научный сотрудник лаборатории «ЦифрА»

L.V. Zotkina, Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography of the Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (Novosibirsk, Russia)

кандидат исторических наук, научный сотрудник отдела археологии палеометалла

R.A. Shelepaev, V.S. Sobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy of the Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (Novosibirsk, Russia); Novosibirsk State University (Novosibirsk, Russia)

кандидат геолого-минералогических наук, старший научный сотрудник Лаборатории петрологии и рудоносности магматических формаций; доцент кафедры петрографии и геологии рудных месторождений

Ya.Yu. Shelepov, V.S. Sobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy of the Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (Novosibirsk, Russia); Novosibirsk State University (Novosibirsk, Russia)

инженер лаборатории петрологии и рудоносности магматических формаций; младший научный сотрудник лаборатории эволюции палеоокеанов и мантийного магматизма, ассистент кафедры минералогии и геохимии

B. Gunchinsuren, Institute of Archaeology of Academy of Science of Mongolia (Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia)

кандидат исторических наук, ведущий научный сотрудник

D. Odsuren, Institute of Archaeology of Academy of Science of Mongolia (Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia)

кандидат исторических наук, старший научный сотрудник

E.P. Rybin, Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography of the Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (Novosibirsk, Russia)

кандидат исторических наук, старший научный сотрудник отдела археологии каменного века

D.W. Olsen, University of Arizona (Tucson, USA)

доктор философии, регент-профессор Школы антропологии

References

Kulik N.A., Shunkov M.V. Источники каменного сырья палеолитических украшений из Горного Алтая // Проблемы археологии, этнографии и антропологии Сибири и сопредельных территорий. Вып. 17. Новосибирск, 2012.

Шуньков М.В., Федорченко А.Ю., Белоусова Н.Е. Новые данные по украшениям из серпентина ранней стадии верхнего палеолита со стоянки Усть-Каракол // Проблемы археологии, этнографии и антропологии Сибири и сопредельных территорий. Вып. 24. Новосибирск, 2018.

Хаценович А.М., Рыбин Е.П., Гунчинсурэн Б., Болорбат Ц., Одсурэн Д., Ангарагдулгуун Г., Маргад-Эрдэнэ Г. Человек и Struthio Asiaticus: страница палеолитического искусства в восточной части Центральной Азии // Известия Иркутского гос. ун-та. Серия: Геоархеология. Этнология. Антропология. 2017. № 21.

Talamo S., Richards M. A Comparison of Bone Pretreatment Methods for AMS Dating of Samples >30, 000 BP // Radiocarbon. 2011. Iss. 53.

Хаценович А.М. Ранние этапы верхнего палеолита Северной Монголии : автореф. дис. ... канд. ист. наук. Новосибирск, 2018.

Travin A.V., Yudin D.S., Vladimirov A.G., Khromykh S.V., Volkova N.I., Mekhonoshin A.S., Kolotilina T.B. Thermochronology of the Chernorud Granulite Zone, Olkhon Region, Western Baikal Area // Geochemistry International. 2009. Vol.11 (47).

Semenov S.A. Prehistoric Technology. An Experimental Study of the Oldest Tools and Artefacts from the Trace of Manufacture and Wear. L., 1964.

Keeley L.H. Experimental Determination of Stone Tool Uses. Chicago, 1980.

Mazukabzov A.M., Sklyarov E.V., Donskaya T.V., Gladkochub D.P, Fedorovsky V.S. 2011. Metamorphic Core Complexes ofthe Transbaikalia: Review // Geodynamics & Tectonophysics. 2011. Iss. 2(2).

Pitulko V.V., Kuzmin Ya.V., Glascock M.D., Pavlova E.Yu., Grebennikov A.V. They Came from the Ends of the Earth’: Long-distance Exchange of Obsidian in the High Arctic during the Early Holocene // Antiquity. 2019. Vol. 93(367).

Рыбин Е.П. Хронология и географическое распространение культурно значимых артефактов в начальном верхнем палеолите Северной Азии и восточной части Центральной Азии // Известия Алтайского гос. ун-та. 2014. Вып. 4 (84). Т. 1.

Рыбин Е.П., Хаценович А.М., Шелепаев Р.А., Попов А.Ю., Колмогоров Ю.П. Петрохимические исследования источников каменного сырья в палеолите Северной Монголии // Вестник Новосибирского гос. ун-та. Серия: История, филология. 2016. Т. 15, вып. 7: Археология и этнография.

Published
2019-12-13
How to Cite
Khatsenovich A., Zotkina L., Shelepaev R., Shelepov Y., Gunchinsuren B., Odsuren D., Rybin E., Olsen D. Study of Perforated Mica from the Initial Upper Paleolithic Complex in Mongolia: Traceological Analysis and 40Ar/39Ar Dating // Izvestiya of Altai State University, 2019, № 6(110). P. 105-111 DOI: 10.14258/izvasu(2019)6-18. URL: http://izvestiya.asu.ru/article/view/%282019%296-18.