Dekulakization and Collectivization in the Krasnoyarsk Territory: from the «Radical Fracture» to the Correction of «Kinks in the Field»
УДК 94(571.5).084 ББК 63.3(2Рос-4Крн)61
Abstract
The theme of the policy of "eliminating the kulaks as a class", carried out during forced collectivization, is relevant both for historians and for modern Russian society. At the present stage of the study, the analysis of the dekulakization practice that was carried out in the beginning of 1930, both on the scale of the entire Soviet Union and within individual regions, remains relevant. The article considers the policy of "eliminating the kulaks as a class" on the territory of the districts that are currently part of the modern Krasnoyarsk territory on the basis of documents from the Krasnoyarsk state archive. The focus of attention is on forced collectivization in the in the Sukhobuzimsky, Yeniseysky, Uyarsky, Partizansky, Balakhtinsky, Abansky, novoselovsky, Pirovsky, Kazachinsky, Yeniseysky, More-Murtinsky, Kansk, Achinsky, Mansky and Krasnoyarsk districts in the period from December 1929 to April 1930. It is concluded that dekulakization in these areas allowed for a high percentage of collectivization of farms, but under the pressure of widespread peasant resistance, both the Union leadership and the leadership of the considered areas of the modern Krasnoyarsk territory were forced to temporarily suspend the process of repression and to carry out demonstrative punishment of local leaders for excesses committed during the policy of dekulakization. After the condemnation of excesses, the outflow of peasant farms from collective farms began. As a result, the article partially defines the regional specifics of the dekulakization process in December 1929 — April 1930 in the regions located on the territory of the modern Krasnoyarsk territory.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Ивницкий Н.А. Судьба раскулаченных в СССР. М., 2004.
Корсакова О.В. Крестьяне-спецпереселенцы в Сибири в 1930-е гг. (на материалах Красноярского края) : автореф. дис. ... канд. ист. наук. Красноярск, 2001.
Папков С.А. Обыкновенный террор. Политика сталинизма в Сибири. М., 2012.
Сталин И.В. Сочинения. М., 1949. Т. 12.
Гущин Н.Я. Раскулачивание в Сибири (1928-1934): методы, этапы, социально-экономические и демографические последствия. Новосибирск, 1996.
Озерова О.А. Применение насильственных методов и репрессий в период сплошной коллективизации в 1930-1932 гг. (на примере тюркских народов Западной Сибири) // Омский научный вестник. 2012. №5.
Государственный архив Красноярского края (ГАКК). Ф.Р. 55. Оп. 2. Д. 15.
Красноярье пять веков истории. Красноярск, 2006.
ГАКК. Ф.Р. 55. Оп. 2. Д. 8.
ГАКК. Ф. 55. Оп. 2. Д. 2.
ГАКК. Ф.Р. 10. Оп. 1. Д. 714.
ГАКК. Ф.Р. 96. Оп. 1. Д. 817.
ГАКК. Ф.П.-46. Оп. 1. Д. 10.
Трагедия советской деревни. Коллективизация и раскулачивание / отв. ред. Н.А. Ивницкий. М., 2000. Т. 2.
Спецпереселенцы в Западной Сибири. Весна 1931 — начало 1933 г.: сб. / отв. ред. В.И. Данилов, С.А. Красильников. Новосибирск, 1993.
Ильиных В.А. Сельское хозяйство Восточной Сибири в период коллективизации: динамика, организационно-производственная структура // Иркутский историко-экономический ежегодник. Иркутск, 2014.
Земсков В.Н. Судьба «кулацкой ссылки» (1930-1954 гг.) // Отечественная история. 1994. №1.
Copyright (c) 2020 Роман Сергеевич Есин

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Izvestiya of Altai State University is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.
Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at biological or scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.
Izvestiya of Altai State University allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission to Izvestiya of Altai State University) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).



