Socio-Psychological and Legal Factors of Lies
Abstract
The article deals with the criminal law aspect of lies as a way to counter the successful activity of a lawyer (in particular, criminal law specialization) to achieve the truth as the main goal of criminal proceedings (article 6 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation). The analysis of the factors provoking this phenomenon, and, accordingly, actualizing the need to update the tactical and psychological arsenal of investigative bodies is given. It was found that a number of factors are due to gaps in the Federal legislation of the Russian Federation. Conclusions are drawn on possible ways to overcome this counteraction to a successful preliminary investigation, i.e. the initiating of criminal proceedings. The authors of the article came to the conclusion that it is important to improve the competence of lawyers and experts, specialists, whose goal is to overcome the opposing force of lies. As an expedient and innovative option, the psychotechnics of profiling in the direction of non-instrumental lie detection is proposed.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Уголовно-процессуальный кодекс Российской Федерации : Федеральный закон от 18 декабря 2001 г. № 174-ФЗ (ред. от 23.04.2018) // СПС «КонсультантПлюс».
Джумаева Р. Х. Истина как главная цель уголовного судопроизводства России // Теория и практика общественного развития. — 2014. — № 16.
Спирица Е.Н. Психология лжи и обмана. — СПб., 2015.
Фрай О. Ложь. Три способа выявления лжи. — СПб., 2006.
Уголовный кодекс Российской Федерации : Федеральный закон от 13 июня 1996 г. № 63-ФЗ (ред. от 25.04.2018) // СПС «КонсультантПлюс».
Карпенко О.А. Сущность дачи заведомо ложных показаний как приема противодействия расследованию преступлений // Вестник Казанского юрид. ин-та МВД России. — 2017. № 2 (28).
Конституция Российской Федерации : Федеральный закон от 12 декабря 1993 г. № 11-ФКЗ (ред. от 21.07.2014) // СПС «КонсультантПлюс».
Арбитражно-процессуальный кодекс Российской Федерации : Федеральный закон от 24 июля 2002 г. № 95-ФЗ (ред. от 28.12.2017) // СПС «КонсультантПлюс».
Гражданско-процессуальный кодекс Российской Федерации : Федеральный закон от 14 ноября 2002 г. № 138-ФЗ (ред. от 03.04.2018) // СПС «КонсультантПлюс».
Власов А.И. Психолого-акмеологические технологии выявления заведомо ложных показаний в следственной деятельности : автореф. дис. … докт. психол. наук. — М., 2010.
Izvestiya of Altai State University is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.
Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at biological or scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.
Izvestiya of Altai State University allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission to Izvestiya of Altai State University) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
